If you sell a product and say that it contains a certain ingredient, by law it actually has to have that ingredient in it.
If it doesn’t, that’s not just deceptive advertising, it’s illegal. A warning letter recently sent by the FDA to Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Company states :”The Lamb and Rice dog food contains no discernable traces of lamb, though there is “bovine material”. The Grain Free Duck pet food has the same problem. “(T)he analytical sample results did not detect the presence of duck in the product.”
That’s a real problem.
The FDA alleges Evangers failed to provide requested processing and production records for 2009. This letter is just a warning, putting the company on public notice.
They’re not alleging that the food is unsafe. They are”only” accused of advertising the food as something it actually is not what they claim it to be
This is not the first time Evanger’s have been in trouble.
Such stories are very unsettling. What good is it to carefully study the label if the label lies?
Here is a link to the FDA letter.
[…] post Rethinking Reward Based Training appeared first on NYC Dog […]Pingback by Rethinking Reward Based Training – DogRelations NYC on June 9, 2017 at 6:19 pm
[…] When I walk around the city I see all these dogs trained with different approaches. Putting aside the sad fact that there are way too many pinch collars and choke chains around there is an encouraging number of dogs who are taught with reward based training… or let’s say: a version of reward based training. Here is where I still see that there is a missing link of understanding at least in the way I see reward based training really working. Read More > […]Pingback by Rethinking Reward Based Training | Lifestyle Okanagan Blog on June 12, 2017 at 4:25 pm